A friend gave me a bamboo to test, sold under the name Yushania confusa. This modestly sized plant is said to reach a maximum height of 6 feet, growing from a base only 2-3 feet wide, and arching up to 9 feet wide without pruning to keep it more upright. It's described as "tightly clumping."
Hm, a tightly clumping Yushania? That doesn't sound right. Despite one nursery describing the genus as including both "tight clumpers" and "semi-runners," (which may have been true at one point during the taxonomic shuffle) the current definition of the genus only includes those species with extended rhizome necks, the "semi-runners." So a tightly clumping bamboo can't be a Yushania, right?
Clearly something is off. Some digging lead me to the botanical description for the real Yushaniaconfusa, the full text of which is available here. It describes the rhizome necks as ranging from 10cm to 40cm, or about 4" to 16". That doesn't sound tightly clumping, now does it? Culm internodes purple spotted, with persistent culm sheaths? Auricles absent. None of this matches the plant I was given. Further inspection would undoubtedly provide more evidence, but the rhizome length alone is enough to tell me this plant is not Yushania confusa. I doubt the real Yushania confusa is even in cultivation outside of China.
 |
| Close-up of leaves, with the slightly darker auricles visible in a couple spots if you look closely. |
What, then, is the identity of this small clumping bamboo? Further internet digging led me to the catalog of Kimmei, a renowned bamboo nursery in the Netherlands responsible for introducing the majority of new species from China in the last two decades, and from Europe these plants make their way to America. In the catalog is a plant they call Fargesia'Rufa''Dwarf', with the note that it has been in cultivation under the name Yushania confusa.
 |
| Foliage and sheaths do indeed look much like the commonly available 'Rufa' |
Here, now, the mystery appears to be solved. The name provided by Kimmei still has some issues. For instance, a plant can't have two cultivar names, so 'Rufa''Dwarf' doesn't work. Now, here's another bit of confusion: the plant introduced as Fargesia rufa, or Fargesia'Rufa' was determined to be the true Fargesia dracocephala. The plant initially introduced as Fargesia dracocephala was determined to be another species, F. apicirubens. So, the standard form, 'Rufa', is now known as Fargesia dracocephala'Rufa'. It can grow 6' to 10' tall.
 |
| Fargesiadracocephala'Rufa' in my garden, just surpassing 6' after 4 years. The dwarf form should max out around this size. |
Back to the plant known as 'Rufa''Dwarf', aka Yushaniaconfusa, it would correctly be known as a form of Fargesia dracocephala. Since the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants prohibits cultivar names which are purely descriptive (such as 'Dwarf', or 'Blue', or anything similarly vague that could cause confusion). Given this, the most correct name for this plant currently would be Fargesia dracocephala (dwarf form), or some similar descriptive name, at least until it's given an acceptable cultivar name.
While not a common plant, I hope this post will help those few looking for information about "Yushania confusa" and save them the trouble of the detective work I went through.